step 1. But really, into the family history, we all knowthat for every signal there’s a different. A vexing area ofgenealogy is the fact not one person really understands just how to make use of the latest conditions orrules which have one decisive adjective such usually, perhaps, most likely,likely, etcetera. It would be interesting in the event that indeed there other advice ofjointures becoming produced a year otherwise one or two shortly after a well-known relationships go out.

dos. Is there an enthusiastic extant dispensation to your matrimony regarding ElizabethClifford and Sir Ralph Bowes who have been 3rd cousins through Henry Fitzhugh,third Lord Fitzhugh otherwise last cousins, after taken off the latest 5th LordClifford? asiame That would restrict the matrimony go out.

Arthur

Allegedly, in the event that a beneficial dispensation is desired and you will supplied, it could havebeen by one of many after the, and can even appear in the fresh new correspondingregister book, if this survives:

Thomas Savage, Archbishop off York 1501-1507Christopher Bainbridge, Bishop away from Durham 1507-1508, Archbishop of York1508-1514William Senhouse, Bishop out-of Durham 1502-1505Thomas Ruthall, Bishop out-of Durham 1509-1523Richard Leyburn, Bishop of Carlisle 1502-1508John Penny, Bishop of Carlisle 1509-1520

5. When your tenth Lord Clifford really does get married at the beginning of 1487 [say January] andhas Age later because seasons, really does the fresh chronology perhaps not functions?

John palms?

Age born in late 1487, Henry born when you look at the 1488/nine, Joan when you look at the ,etc. completing the names of your own upload off . If the (a) thechronology however really works; and you may (b) her relationship part wasn’t reasonable; thenwe just have the fresh 1505 pedigree regarding Henry VII’s that is during the oppositionto the latest conjecture one she is a legitimate child.

six. About your 1505 pedigree: Are the Clifford daughters the onlyknown Henry VII interactions omitted? Are there anyone else? In that case,won’t that reflect poorly on this subject document while the a resource?

Regarding contrasting You will find produced from the newest c.1505 Henry VII Affairs pedigreeswith this new 1480-1500 Visitation of Northern pedigrees, which are

Regarding c.1505 Connections pedigrees, the fresh Clifford children are maybe not listedin an effective Clifford pedigree, but instead on the St. John pedigree. Just like the I’mnot used to the new St. John family relations, after the is the advice asit looks throughout the c.1505 pedigree, due to the fact taken from this new 1834 Coll. Most useful. etGen. article. The fresh phrasing into the quotations is strictly because it looks inthe 1834 post (pp. 310-311).

« No. XII. »Of my personal Lord Welles child, Sir Richard Rod, Mistress Verney, SirJohn St. John, with other. »f.288, 296, 317, 318. »Margaret Duchess away from Somerset got three husbands. » By the « John Duke ofSomerset » she had « My Lady brand new King’s Mom. » that has « Brand new King. » whohad « Prince « By the « Sir Oliver Saint John, very first husband. » she got 3 daus & 2 sons:

A. « Edith, married so you’re able to Geoffrey Rod off Buckinghamshire. » They had:A1. « Sir Richard Pole, Knt. wedded to the Lady Margaret, dau. of theDuke of Clarence. » They had: « Harry. « A2. « Alianor, married so you can Ralph Verney, Esq. » They’d: « John Verney.—– [child, unnamed]. ——-[a different sort of youngster, unnamed]. »

B. « John Ssint John, esq. » He’d four people:B1. « Sir John Saint John, Knight. » who had « Four daughters and you will oneson. »B2. « Anne, wedd. to Harry Lord Clifford. » That they had « Jane. Mabill.Henry, son and you can heir. Anne. Thomas. Alianor. »B3. « Elizabeth, married to help you Thomas Kent, Esq. off Lincolnshire. »B4. « A good Nun out-of Shaftesbury. »B5. « Oliver Saint John. »

C. « Dame Mary, wedded to Sir Richard Frognall. » That they had:C1. « Edmond Frognall along with his brethren and you may sistren. » Which have issueindicated, however named.C2. « Age, wedded to help you Sir William Gascoigne, Knt. »

D. « E, wedded earliest with the Lord Zouche; once into LordScrope out-of Bolton. » Issue:D1. [from the Zouche]  » Catesby. » They had: »Age. George. John. William. »D2. [because of the Scrope]  » Conyers. » Which have issueindicated but not called.

Margaret Duchess away from Somerset, by the « Lionel Lord Welles, last spouse. »had: « John Viscount Welles, wedded Cecily, dau. out-of K. Edward IV. » andthey got « E. »