101 . Newhagen , John Elizabeth. , “Past notice-report: Having fun with latency to resolve design practical question reacting procedure toward web-based public-opinion surveys,” in the Sourcebook having Governmental Interaction Research , eds. Bucy , Erik P. and Lance Holbert , Roentgen. ( Ny : Routledge , 2011 ).Yahoo Student

102 . Oxley , Douglas Roentgen. , Smith , Kevin B. , Alford , John Roentgen. , Hibbing , Matthew V. , Miller , Jennifer L. , Scalora , Mario , Hatemi , Peter K. , and you can Hibbing , John Roentgen. , “Governmental attitudes vary that have emotional traits,” Technology , 321 : 1667 – 1670 .CrossRefGoogle Pupil

103 . Swers , Michele L. , “Is feminine expected to choose to own ladies’ issues costs than simply its male acquaintances?” Legislative Education Every quarter 1998 , 23 : 435 – 448 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

104 . Swers , Michele L. , The difference Female Make: The policy Perception of females into the Congress ( Chicago : School away from Chicago Drive , 2002 ).Google College student

105 . Slope , Kim Quaile and you will Hurley , Patricia Good. , “Emblematic speeches throughout the You.S. Senate and their representational ramifications,” Record from Government 2002 , 64 : 219 – 231 .CrossRefGoogle Pupil

108 . Mansbridge , Jane , “Is always to blacks depict blacks and you may women depict feminine? A great contingent ‘yes’,” Log of Politics 1999 , 61 ( step three ): 627 – 657 .CrossRefGoogle Beginner

109 . Sanbonmatsu , Kira , “Gender-relevant governmental knowledge additionally the descriptive icon of women,” Political Behavior 2003 , twenty-five : 367 – 388 .CrossRefGoogle Beginner

110 . Dolan , Kathleen , “Will there be an excellent ‘gender affinity effect’ inside the American politics? S. Home elections,” Political Search Every quarter 2008 , 61 : 79 – 89 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

This informative article could have been cited of the adopting the products. Which number is made considering data provided by Crossref.

Benstead, Lindsay J. Jamal, Amaney An effective. and you will Lust, Ellen 2015. Would it be Gender, Religiosity or One another? A role Congruity Idea away from Candidate Electability from inside the Transformation Tunisia. Viewpoints into the Politics, Vol. 13, Issue. 1, p. 74.

Bauer, Nichole Yards. 2015. Just who stereotypes women applicants? Identifying individual variations in female label dependence. Politics, Teams, and you will Identities, Vol. step three, Material. step one, p. 94.

Rosenthal , Cindy Simon , “The fresh part regarding gender from inside the descriptive expression,” Governmental Lookup Every quarter 1995 , 48 : 599 – 611

McLaughlin, Bryan Davis, Catasha Coppini, David Kim, Younger sexy belarusian women Mie Knisely, Sandra and you can McLeod, Douglas 2015. When feminine attack. Politics and the Existence Sciences, Vol. 34, Question. step one, p. forty-two.

Pyeatt, Nicholas L. and you may Yanus, Alixandra B. 2016. Sending blended indicators: the brand new part regarding gender and you will partisanship from inside the analysis of political leaders. Log out of Elections, Public opinion and you may Events, Vol. twenty-six, Topic. cuatro, p. 423.

Koch, Thomas and you will Obermaier, Magdalena 2016. That have Center and you will (No) Brain? Exactly how Receiver Adversely Infer Forgotten Information regarding People in politics and exactly how That it Influences new Review of your Speakermunication Search, Vol. 43, Matter. seven, p. 972.

Turska-Kawa, Agnieszka and you can Olszanecka-. Stereotypes Deciding Attitudes away from Feminine Political figures: The scenario from Poland. Politics during the Main European countries, Vol. 14, Topic. step three, p. 7.

Schneider, Monica C. and you may Bos, Angela L. 2019. The application of Personal Role Concept on the Study of Gender inside Government. Governmental Psychology, Vol. forty, Issue. S1, p. 173.

Park, Sunshine Young and you may Baek, More youthful Min 2019. Citizens’ Ambivalence into the Women Politicians: As to the reasons Ambivalence Matters to have Gender Equality in the an effective Democracy. Record of women, Government & Rules, Vol. 40, Thing. dos, p. 309.

Rusidze, Nino 2019. Stereotypes, Profile Assassination and you may Feamales in Government. Corvinus Journal out-of In the world Activities, Vol. 4, Material. 1, p. 15.

Aaldering, Loes and Van Der Pas, Daphne Joanna 2020. Political Leadership about Mass media: Gender Bias for the Commander Stereotypes during Strategy and you will Regimen Moments. United kingdom Log out of Political Technology, Vol. fifty, Topic. 3, p. 911.

Boer, Noortje 2020. How do Customers Assess Path?Peak Bureaucrats’ Desire and you will Ability? A Typology and you will Attempt. Personal Government Feedback, Vol. 80, Point. cuatro, p. 532.